Lebanon and Israel approach positions in pilot areas under US mediation

Progress in Rome towards an Israeli withdrawal in two areas of southern Lebanon, with American mediation.

After two days of US-brokered talks in Rome, Lebanon and Israel moved toward implementing pilot zones in southern Lebanon, where Israeli forces would withdraw and hand over control to the Lebanese army. This was reported on Wednesday by the US State Department.

What was agreed?

The most recent war between Israel and Hezbollah broke out when the Lebanese group launched rockets into Israeli territory days after Tel Aviv and Washington began their conflict against Iran on February 28. Since then, Israel has occupied a wide swath of southern Lebanon. Hezbollah opposes direct negotiations.

RelatedIsrael-Lebanon peace framework faces resistance from Hezbollah

The State Department statement called the talks “productive” and noted that the parties “agreed on the structure and guidelines for the pilot zones process, which will be finalized and implemented in the coming days.” So far, neither Lebanon nor Israel have officially declared the result.

Pilot zones and controversy

Both countries signed a “framework agreement” on June 26, which outlines the Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon and steps towards a future peace agreement. The plan would begin with two pilot zones where the Israeli army would cede control to the Lebanese, which would clear those areas of Hezbollah presence. However, implementation had stalled.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun — who will visit Washington on July 21 — instructed his delegation in Rome “to demand the immediate withdrawal of Israeli forces from the two pilot zones before any further discussions.”

The zones generated controversy because Israeli troops were not present in much of the selected area, which questioned how a withdrawal could occur. The Lebanese army was seeking larger areas that included more occupied territory.

The State Department indicated that after implementing the pilot zones, it will move on to “expanded technical talks… with the goal of reaching a comprehensive agreement between Israel and Lebanon.”

Reactions

Hezbollah and Iran had attempted to link the end of the Lebanese conflict to broader talks between the US and Iran. The Lebanese government sought to separate both paths to negotiate a direct ceasefire with Israel. The armed group has declared that it will not abide by the agreement or disarm. Israeli officials, for their part, plan a prolonged occupation of southern Lebanon.

In an interview with Fox News, US President Donald Trump said he wants to see Israel withdraw from Lebanon and southern Syria, or “reposition” its forces.

“Southern Syria and parts of Lebanon, yes, it would be good to get out, I think, and I think you could see things calm down a little bit,” Trump said, adding: “We have to focus our energy on the big leagues. The big leagues are Iran.”

Trump also repeated his proposal that Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa send forces to Lebanon to “deal with” Hezbollah. Al-Sharaa has said that Syria wants to stay out of the regional war and will not intervene militarily in Lebanon.

Trump authorizes direct flights to Lebanon after decades

The US president will allow commercial flights to Lebanon and meets with the Lebanese president to promote peace.

Direct flights and diplomatic dialogue

President Donald Trump announced that his administration will allow the resumption of direct flights between the United States and Lebanon, suspended since 1985 after the hijacking of TWA Flight 847. The measure became known after his meeting at the White House with the Lebanese president, Joseph Aoun.

“I am ordering my Administration to allow all US airlines to fly directly to Lebanon so that Americans can easily visit this beautiful land,” Trump wrote on social media.

During the meeting, Trump promised to “help a lot” to Lebanon. Aoun is the first Lebanese leader to visit Washington since 2009. The visit occurs in a context of regional tension, after months of conflict between Israel and the armed group Hezbollah, backed by Iran.

Progress towards a framework agreement

Lebanon and Israel signed a framework agreement on June 26 that provides for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the south of the country and the disarmament of Hezbollah. The implementation began in pilot areas such as Zawtar al-Gharbieh, where the Lebanese army has already begun to deploy. However, disagreements remain: Israeli forces fired warning shots during the operation, although both sides differ over the location of the incident.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio backed the deal: “How do you replace Hezbollah? You defeat them and replace them with a government strong enough to be the only armed force in the country.” He warned that Lebanon will not be at peace until the issue of the armed group is resolved.

Trump mentioned that he would speak to Hezbollah personally if Aoun asked him to, and even raised the possibility of Syria intervening against the organization. Both options are unpopular in Lebanon.

Caution on the ground

Abed Ezzeldine, mayor of Zawtar al-Gharbieh, sounded cautious: displaced residents will be able to check their homes, but not stay because of the destroyed infrastructure. “The houses have been demolished. They (the Israelis) have destroyed the streets,” he declared.

Israel plans to maintain a prolonged military presence in a “security zone” in the south. Meanwhile, the Lebanese government, emerged from a reformist campaign in 2025, insists that Israeli withdrawal and international financial support are essential for a sustainable solution. The recent conflict left more than 4,000 dead and 1.2 million displaced in Lebanon.

Continue reading

Zelenskyy dismisses Syrskyi amid protests in Ukraine

The change in high command responds to citizen pressure and internal criticism.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy dismissed General Oleksandr Syrskyi as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, following several days of protests in kyiv and other cities demanding his ouster. In his place, he appointed Mijailo Drapatyi, according to an official statement.

“Our shared desire is one: victory over the enemy,” Zelenskyy declared.

Citizen pressure and internal changes

It was Zelenskyy’s second major turn under pressure from public opinion. The protests also demanded the reinstatement of former Defense Minister Mikhailo Fedorov, seen as a driver of military modernization. Syrskyi was criticized for representing a Soviet-style command culture.

Zelenskyy thanked Syrskyi for the defense of kyiv and the operations in Kharkiv and Kursk. He then introduced Drapatyi as the new boss.

Drapatyi wrote on Facebook:

“Serving Ukraine has always been an honor for me… I will work with responsibility, with focus and with respect for the people who defend our State today.”

Fedorov congratulated Drapatyi and called the appointment “a new hope in the struggle of free peoples for freedom and justice.” Zelenskyy offered Fedorov a position to unify the technology sector, but it was not confirmed whether he accepted.

Fedorov had publicly criticized Syrskyi, saying that he was blocking his reforms and that he should be replaced. After the impeachment, he called Syrskyi to thank him for his contributions, but noted that the country must move faster and correct mistakes.

Continue reading

New US attacks on Iran raise tensions in the Middle East

Ninth night of US strikes against military targets in Iran.

The United States launched a new air offensive against Iran early this Monday, the ninth consecutive night of bombing. Washington confirmed the death of another American soldier in Iraq, while Tehran responded by attacking Bahrain and Kuwait, key US allies in the region.

Objectives and implications

The US Central Command reported that the attacks targeted command centers, air defense, coastal surveillance, missile and drone bases, as well as Iranian communication networks. Official Iranian media reported at least one death near Tabriz, an area where there are allegedly underground bases of the Revolutionary Guard. Attacks were also recorded in other strategic provinces.

The escalation reached the Strait of Hormuz: a merchant ship caught fire after being hit by a projectile near the coast of Oman, forcing the crew to evacuate it. The Revolutionary Guard claimed to have attacked oil tankers in the area. Bahrain activated anti-missile sirens and Kuwait confirmed that its air defenses intercepted Iranian projectiles.

Oil impact and diplomacy

The price of Brent oil exceeded $90 per barrel due to the interruption of maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, through which about a fifth of the world’s crude oil transited before the conflict. Washington maintains a naval blockade on Iranian ports to stop its exports.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio reiterated that the US remains open to negotiating, although he acknowledged that there are still no conditions for an agreement. Iranian authorities confirmed proposals through mediators, while former Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif insisted that only diplomacy will prevent further escalation. Since the start of the war on February 28, 17 US service members have died; According to Tehran, the recent bombings left at least 50 dead and 517 injured in Iranian territory.

Continue reading