An analysis from constitutional experience
The Minister of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), Lenia Batres Guadarrama, announced the publication of her book “Judiciary Power by Popular Vote.” The work is presented one year after citizens elected judges at the polls for the first time.
Batres detailed on social networks that the text addresses one of the most relevant debates in contemporary constitutional life: the appointment of judges, magistrates and ministers through suffrage.
Scope, risks and challenges
Edited by Porrúa, the book analyzes the historical, constitutional and comparative aspects of this model. It also reviews international experiences on popular judicial selection.
The minister, who has been identified as “Minister of the People”, pointed out that the popular election opens a discussion about democratic legitimacy, judicial independence and accountability.
According to the synopsis, the text reflects on the future of justice in Mexico and the construction of a system that combines citizen participation with jurisdictional autonomy.
Context of the debate
The publication occurs at a time of growing interest in citizen participation in the election of judges. The issue has generated controversy among specialists and political actors.
Batres has been one of the promoters of this reform from the highest court. His work seeks to provide elements for the analysis of an institutional change that is already being applied in the country.




