War in Iran threatens endangered species

Iranian veterinarians and conservationists assess the impact of airstrikes on threatened species.

Just days after fighting between the United States, Israel and Iran began, veterinarian Reza Kiamarzi climbed cliffs near Isfahan. He was looking for nests of saker and peregrine falcons, threatened birds whose breeding season coincided with the bombings. “It’s a long climb. Then we climb rocks to get to the nests,” he said.

Iran is home to unique biodiversity: from humid Caspian forests to arid areas of the Persian Gulf. At least 86 species are at risk, according to the Department of the Environment: the Asiatic cheetah, the Persian fallow deer, the leopard, the brown bear and birds of prey, among others. The country is a key migratory stop between Eurasia and Africa.

RelatedSemar secures 61 olive ridley turtle nests in Michoacán

Iman Ebrahimi, from the NGO AvayeBoom, warned: “It is a great unknown how much more we will be able to work. We are waiting.” The conflict worsens the economic crisis. The Iranian currency lost more than half its value in a year, fueling falcon smuggling into the Persian Gulf. Ironically, in peace the military zones served as a refuge from poachers.

Jamshid Parchizadeh, an expert on large carnivores, fears that airstrikes will damage cheetah and leopard habitats: “They degrade the soil, contaminate the water and destroy vegetation.” He added: “The bombing drives away the bears and leopards forever.”

Conservation despite everything

AvayeBoom has operated for a decade in mountains, deserts and wetlands. But sanctions prevent receiving international donations. “What worries us most is that the economic crisis will make environmental protection no longer a priority,” Ebrahimi said.

A wildlife photographer, who requested anonymity for safety reasons, has stopped taking images in the Persian Gulf. “One of the dangers is that people lose their connection with nature,” he said. He plans to resume his job if the tension does not escalate.

Despite everything, AvayeBoom made progress. In the Arjan protected area, a campaign with workshops and murals of the cinnamon shelduck—an orange-plumed water bird—raised local awareness. “Most people considered the environment and wetlands very important,” said Fateme Kazemi, director of the NGO.

“Our doors have not closed and we have continued with our work,” concluded Ebrahimi.

Haaland’s footprint: 559 Peruvian babies bear her name

559 Peruvians registered their children with the name of the Norwegian forward after the 2026 World Cup.

The Haaland phenomenon in Peruvian civil registries

The impact of the 2026 World Cup is not only measured in goals. In Peru, at least 559 babies were registered with a name inspired by Norwegian striker Erling Haaland. This was reported by the National Registry of Identification and Civil Status (Reniec).

Of that total, 468 infantrymen were simply given “Haaland” as a name, while another 91 were registered as “Erling Haaland.” The figure could increase, since birth records are still open.

According to Reniec, the phenomenon gained strength after Haaland’s double in the round of 16 against Brazil. That 2-1 allowed Norway’s historic qualification to the quarterfinals of the tournament.

But Haaland is not the only footballer who inspires Peruvian parents. Reniec explained that in the country there are already 3,402 people named Messi, 1,185 with the name Cristiano Ronaldo and 1,241 registered as Yamal, in reference to the Argentine star, the Portuguese and the Spanish attacker.

The absolute record, however, is held by the Brazilian Neymar: almost 34 thousand Peruvians have that name on their identity document.

Continue reading

France approves aid-in-dying law with strict conditions

The National Assembly approved the measure with 291 votes in favor and 241 against.

A historic step at the end of life

France’s National Assembly gave the final green light to a bill that allows adults with incurable diseases to receive medication to end their life. The vote was 291 in favor and 241 against, after a long parliamentary process initiated more than three years ago by President Emmanuel Macron.

“I made a commitment to the French people to open this path. With seriousness, humility and respect for our democracy, that commitment has been fulfilled,” Macron wrote in X.

Rigorous conditions

The law focuses on self-administration of lethal medication. Only patients over 18 years of age, citizens or legal residents, with a serious, incurable disease and in an advanced or terminal phase can request it. The pain must be unbearable and uncontrollable, and the request voluntary.

Psychological suffering alone does not qualify. People with serious psychiatric disorders or neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s are also not eligible. The process includes an application reviewed in 15 days and a reflection period of at least two days.

The patient will be able to choose the time and place, even at home, accompanied by loved ones. A doctor or nurse will verify your wish moments before and will remain nearby in case complications arise. Health insurance will cover all costs.

Divided reactions

The Association for the Right to Die with Dignity celebrated the law: it allows “choosing to end unbearable suffering, freely and with full awareness.” Its president, Jonathan Denis, stressed that “a law that creates a new right never forces anyone to exercise it.”

In contrast, the anti-euthanasia group Alliance Vita warned that “presenting death as a desirable solution can never be an acceptable response to suffering” and called for strengthening palliative care. They fear pressure on elderly or disabled people.

Constitutional review pending

The Senate, with a conservative majority, rejected the project. However, the National Assembly has the final say. Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu and the president of the Senate will refer the law to the Constitutional Council, which must rule within a month. Only after that approval will it come into force.

France thus joins the countries that regulate medical assistance in dying. In the United Kingdom, a similar project is advancing with new amendments, while in Germany the Bundestag rejected two proposals in 2023.

Continue reading

Mexico joins the neutrality protocol of the Panama Canal

Sheinbaum and Mulino agree to strengthen cooperation and support the interoceanic waterway.

Mexico formalized its support for the neutrality protocol of the Panama Canal, an interoceanic waterway that the Panamanian government seeks to shield against global tensions. President Claudia Sheinbaum announced the decision after meeting with her counterpart José Raúl Mulino at the headquarters of the Panamanian Executive.

Support for Panamanian sovereignty

Sheinbaum stated that he shares with Mulino the conviction that current challenges are faced with collaboration and strengthening the sovereignties and institutions of each country. The neutrality protocol is part of the treaties signed in 1977 by Jimmy Carter and Omar Torrijos. There, the transfer of the canal to Panama was agreed in December 1999, after more than 80 years of US control.

At least 40 countries have joined the protocol. This establishes that the canal will remain safe and open for the peaceful transit of ships of all nations, both in peace and war, and that it will not be the target of reprisals in any armed conflict.

Wider cooperation

In addition to supporting the channel, Sheinbaum and Mulino agreed to strengthen cooperation in trade, agribusiness, security, tourism, investments and infrastructure. Mulino thanked the support for Panamanian sovereignty and described the canal as a “neutral tool of world trade.” He also urged other countries in the region to join the protocol.

Last April, Mulino expressed concern about the increase in detentions of Panamanian ships in Chinese ports, and noted that Panama was left in the middle of tensions between the United States and China.

Strategic importance

The 82-kilometer Panama Canal connects the Atlantic with the Pacific. Approximately 14,000 ships transit through it a year, making it a vital infrastructure for international trade. In light of the conflict in the Middle East and the temporary closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the canal has gained greater relevance as a safe route for global maritime cargo.

Continue reading