Extension of the tariff pause between the United States and China
The United States and China agreed to extend their tariff truce for an additional 90 days, according to the South China Morning Post. Delegations from both countries will meet in Stockholm, Sweden, to discuss major sticking points, including U.S. concerns about Chinese industrial overcapacity. However, no concrete progress is expected in this round of negotiations.
Details of the negotiations and key positions
According to sources close to the talks, during this grace period, both nations agree not to impose new taxes or escalate the trade conflict. China also plans to pressure the United States to review tariffs related to fentanyl, a sensitive issue on the bilateral agenda.
The People’s Daily, the official mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, reiterated Beijing’s willingness to achieve “substantial progress” in the talks. “China maintains a constructive position and advocates for solutions through dialogue on equal terms,” the editorial noted. In addition, he highlighted the importance of strengthening mutual trust and reducing misunderstandings during the meetings in Sweden.
Perspectives and expert statements
Frederic Cho, vice president of the Sweden-China Business Council, considered that the extension of the truce is the most likely scenario. For his part, Scott Bessent, US Secretary of the Treasury, confirmed in an interview with Fox Business that he will work on extending the agreement with his Chinese counterparts.
President Donald Trump, before traveling to Scotland, claimed to have a “draft agreement” with China. This comment comes after two previous rounds of negotiations in Geneva and London, aimed at easing trade tensions following tariff increases imposed by Washington. Currently, the tariffs applied are 10% on US products and 30% on Chinese goods.
Economic impact analysis
The extension of the truce reflects the complexity of resolving structural disputes, such as Chinese subsidies to strategic industries and US trade barriers. Although it avoids an immediate escalation, experts say that stronger agreements are required to ensure long-term stability in global supply chains.
This scenario highlights the economic interdependence between both powers, where unilateral measures could affect financial markets and sectors such as technology, agriculture and manufacturing. The next round in Stockholm will be key to evaluating whether the parties manage to align their strategies or if differences will persist.
Are you interested in following the developments of this negotiation? Share this analysis on your social networks and explore more content on the global economy on our platform.




