Canada matches US tariff exemptions in the T-MEC

A crucial decision redefines the North American trade board, unleashing mixed reactions and an uncertain future for the economies.

A dramatic turn in the commercial destiny of North America

In a move that shook the foundations of the continental economy, Canada has decided to dismantle its retaliatory tariffs, matching the exemptions granted by the United States for products covered under the monumental trade agreement that unites the three nations: the T-MEC. Prime Minister Mark Carney, with the solemnity of someone announcing an armistice, revealed this Friday a decision that promises to redefine the future of millions of commercial exchanges.

Carney, with a voice full of iron conviction, proclaimed that the Canadian nation will incorporate the same exception that its southern neighbor already applied to Canadian products under the 2020 free trade agreement. This protective shield defends the vast majority of goods from the threat of punitive tariffs, in a move that many describe as bold and others as surrender.

RelatedTrump threatens Canada with 100% tariffs over China deal

“Canada has, at this very moment, the best trade agreement with the United States. And although its nature is different from what we knew, its essence remains superior to that of any other nation,” declared Carney, weaving a narrative of unique advantage in an increasingly turbulent and protectionist global landscape.

The call that changed everything

On Thursday, the strings of fate were tightened in a phone call that echoed between Ottawa and Washington. On the other side of the line, the voice of US President Donald Trump sealed an understanding that seemed impossible. Hours later, Carney locked himself in with his cabinet in a meeting of historic consequences, prior to the announcement that would shake the markets.

“We had an extraordinarily positive conversation,” Trump revealed from the sacrosanct Oval Office, with an unusually conciliatory tone. “We are building something big. We want to be extremely generous to Canada. I have deep admiration for Carney. I am convinced that he is a man of excellent character.”

However, in a classic turn of his rhetoric, the president could not help but throw a dagger at the past: “I fight a tireless battle for the United States, since both Canada and Mexico have appropriated a colossal portion of our business over decades.”

Carney, for his part, revealed that Trump hinted to him that lifting these tariffs was not an end, but rather the first step to restarting trade negotiations that promise to be epic. With the scheduled review of the USMCA for 2026 on the horizon, the prime minister painted the treaty as an unrepeatable bulwark for Canada in an era where the United States charges an increasingly high toll for access to its gigantic market.

The American commitment to the core of the USMCA is so strong that it ensures that more than 85% of trade between Canada and the United States flows free of the shadow of tariffs. Carney highlighted, with strategist precision, that the average tariff rate applied by the United States to Canadian products is 5.6%, the lowest figure among all its trading partners, a figure that many consider a ray of hope.

This new scenario opens the door for Canadian and Mexican companies to claim preferential treatment under the umbrella of the T-MEC, activating an unprecedented trade defense mechanism.

The shadow of the trade war and an uncertain future

In this geoeconomic drama, Canada and China emerge as the only protagonists who dared to confront Trump in his global trade crusade. The Canadian nation, in an act of defiance, imposed 25% tariffs in March on an endless list of American products: oranges that lost their sweetness, alcohol that stopped flowing, clothing, footwear, motorcycles and cosmetics became bargaining chips on a geopolitical chessboard.

Former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau started this battle with his retaliatory tariffs, a direct response to the United States offensive. However, in a last-minute act that left everyone speechless, the Trump administration suddenly exempted the products covered by the free trade agreement, momentarily deactivating the time bomb.

Today, most imports from Canada and Mexico still find refuge in the USMCA. But the threat remains. Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, issued a warning that chilled the blood of many: “I believe, with all certainty, that the president is going to renegotiate the USMCA.” A sentence that hangs like a sword of Damocles over the continental economy.

Preserving this free trade agreement is not an option; It is a question of economic survival for Canada and Mexico. More than 75% of Canadian exports have a single destination: the United States. For Mexico, the dependency is even more critical, with more than 80% of its shipments crossing north. The breakup would be a catastrophe of incalculable proportions.

However, peace is fragile. Trump has deployed specific tariffs, the fearsome 232 tariffs, which pierce the USMCA shield and hit vital sectors such as steel and aluminum with 50% taxes, a viciousness that is having a devastating impact on the Canadian economy.

“Canada and the United States have restored free trade for the overwhelming majority of our products,” Carney said, trying to calm the waters. “But Canada will maintain, with unwavering firmness, our tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles as we fight an intense battle to resolve these disputes.”

In a previous move that anticipated this outcome, Carney rescinded the plan to tax powerful American technology companies after Trump, in a fit of fury, announced the suspension of trade talks, calling the Canadian plan a “direct and flagrant attack on our country.”

The prime minister vehemently denied any accusation that Canada is bowing to Trump, arguing that they are simply matching their counterpart’s play. “The president and I had a long and deep conversation,” Carney confessed. “A review of the free trade agreement is coming in the spring. And we, as of now, have begun our preparations for what will be the negotiation of our lives.”

But not everyone views this strategy favorably. Lana Payne, president of Unifor, Canada’s largest private sector union, called Carney’s announcement a humiliating withdrawal. For her, the nation should not go back even one millimeter until the United States eliminates every last one of its punitive tariffs.

“Trump’s ruthless attacks on our automotive, steel, aluminum and forestry sectors are destroying the lives of Canadian workers here and now,” he cried on social media, turning his outrage into a digital rallying cry. “Withdrawing our countertariffs is not an olive branch; it is a surrender that only invites more aggression from the United States.”

The curtain has fallen on this act, but the work is far from over. The economic future of North America hangs in the balance, woven with agreements, threats and the promise of a negotiation that will define the destiny of generations.

Do you think this move will ensure trade peace or is it a prelude to a bigger war? Share this crucial story and explore more analysis on the threads that move the global economy.

Tourism in Cuba plummets: arrivals fall 41.6% in May

Cuba registered only 30,800 tourists in May, a drop of 41.6% year-on-year.

May confirms the downward trend

Cuba received only 30,800 foreign tourists in May, according to the National Office of Statistics and Information (ONEI). The figure represents a year-on-year drop of 41.6% and a slight rebound compared to April.

In the first five months of the year, 359,491 international visitors arrived, 505,706 less than in the same period in 2025. Canada continues to be the main issuing market, with 126,239 tourists. They are followed by Cuban emigrants (60,874) and travelers from the United States (25,572).

Russia, Mexico, Argentina and China also show sharp declines. European countries such as Italy, Portugal and Germany left the top 10. Spain and France only contributed 8,106 and 7,525 visitors, respectively.

The drop has been constant: from 184,833 tourists in January, it fell to 77,663 in February and 35,561 in March.

Factors that aggravate the crisis

Starting in June, the situation will worsen with the departure of foreign hotel companies that operated alongside Gaviota, from the GAESA conglomerate. Dozens of facilities will be out of service. The hotel occupancy rate in the first quarter of 2026 fell to 12.9%, well below the 23.7% of the previous year.

In addition, most international airlines canceled flights due to critical fuel shortages, following the end of shipments from Venezuela and Mexico, and in the face of threats of sanctions from Washington.

In 2025, Cuba received just over 1.8 million foreign visitors, far from the projected 2.6 million. In 2024, 2.2 million arrived and in 2023, 2.4 million. The figures reflect a sustained deterioration in the sector, hit by the lack of fuel, the departure of international companies and lower global demand.

Continue reading

US and Iran reach provisional agreement to reopen Hormuz

The US and Iran agree to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and extend the truce.

The United States and Iran closed a provisional agreement that seeks to end the armed conflict and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, one of the most strategic maritime routes on the planet. The understanding also contemplates extending the fragile ceasefire in force in the region, amid years of military and political tension.

What does the pact contemplate?

The announcement opens the door to a formal signing next Friday in Switzerland, although authorities acknowledge that previous similar attempts have failed. As of Monday, the final content remained in dispute, especially on issues of regional security, nuclear verification and conditions for the lifting of sanctions.

The crisis between both nations has deep roots, from the Iranian nuclear program initiated with international cooperation to the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Since then, relations have been marked by diplomatic ruptures, economic sanctions and indirect clashes in the Middle East. The new agreement could mark a turning point, but doubts remain over its implementation.

Continue reading

Israel criticizes Netanyahu over US-Iran deal

The provisional pact between the US and Iran sparks internal criticism against Netanyahu for possible loss of influence.

Reactions in Israel

Israel is experiencing an intense internal debate after the provisional agreement between the United States and Iran. The pact has generated widespread criticism across the political spectrum, who consider it a strategic setback.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not yet issued an official position. Meanwhile, opposition figures, former officials and analysts react harshly. They point out that the Israeli government overestimated its ability to influence Washington’s strategy during the conflict with Tehran.

Another point of complaint is that the agreement could limit Israel’s freedom of military action, especially on the Lebanon front, where tensions with Hezbollah persist. Government sectors warn that resuming attacks could complicate the relationship with the United States.

International analysts point out that the pact alters the power dynamics in the Middle East. Israel would come under greater strategic pressure. Furthermore, the eventual partial lifting of sanctions on Iran would strengthen its economic and military capacity in the medium term.

Continue reading