China raises its protests over Mexico’s trade restrictions

The Asian giant increases its discontent with the Mexican measures, on a global board where everyone moves chips. Diplomacy and economics collide in a high-stakes game.

The Far East is not so far away to complain

It seems that the trade relationship between Mexico and China is going through that awkward moment in which one of the two decides to raise their voice, like when you complain to your roommate for leaving the dishes dirty. The tension, dear reader, is hotter than a smartphone after a three-hour video call. The Asian country, in a display of patience that rivals that of a saint, has decided that enough of the hints is enough and has raised the volume of its complaints in the face of Mexico’s charming new protectionist measures. The jewel in the crown? A fantastic initiative to impose a tariff of up to 50% on a varied selection of Asian products, a proposal that currently rests, awaiting its fate, in the sacred precincts of the Mexican Congress. And, as in any good modern drama, the neighbor to the north, the United States, is the spectator who animates the show from his seat, with his own trade war against the Asian giant and with the renegotiation of the USMCA on the horizon of 2026. Because what would a bilateral dispute be without a third party to weigh in?

The Chinese Government’s messages have evolved from being those subtle winks that no one understands to becoming formal statements with the seal and signature of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce. This Friday, for example, the authorities of the Asian country, with the precision of a surgeon, indicated that the Mexican Ministry of Economy has initiated four new and intriguing investigations for dumping practices related to Chinese companies that import items of absolute necessity: adhesive tape, steel bolts and PVC plastic pipes. Because nothing says “economic threat” like a roll of tape for sale at a suspiciously low price. “China firmly opposes protectionist actions that harm the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies,” the Chinese government declared in a statement that was undoubtedly written with a smile of circumstance. An understandable stance, coming from a nation famous for its disinterest in protectionism… wait, wasn’t it the other way around?

RelatedTrump anticipates a trade agreement with China in the next summit

The geopolitical laundry account

The Chinese official protest has not remained an anecdote. He alleges, with the forcefulness of someone keeping score, that during 2025, the Mexican Government has opened the not inconsiderable number of at least 11 antidumping investigations against companies or products with a Chinese seal, all at the request of its charming local competitors. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce assures, with a voice breaking with emotion (or indignation), that this represents almost double those that began in 2024. And, oh, coincidence!, all this happens at the same time that the United States has increased the use of tariffs in such an enthusiastic way that it almost seems like a national sport. Mexico, in a plot twist that no one expected, surpassed China as the United States’ main trading partner in 2023. So, with the arrival of Donald Trump to the presidency, the number one priority of the Mexican Government has been, of course, to keep that idyllic bilateral relationship safe, at all costs. Who said that foreign policy was not a matter of feelings?

Diplomacy, that subtle art, has also taken a seat at the debate table. The Chinese embassy in Mexico, abandoning all subtlety, has accused the US government of “practicing economic bullying” to force its partners, like good Mexico, to take a healthy distance from trade with China. “The United States is not really concerned about the development of Mexico, but rather about forcing this country to serve as its geopolitical instrument,” the diplomatic mission stated this week. Come on, they see us as a pawn on their global chess board. Meanwhile, the new Chinese ambassador to Mexico, Chen Daojiang, has chosen the friendly route, publishing a text in the local press where he asks that Mexico and Latin America continue promoting free trade with Asia. A “let’s be friends” message that contrasts beautifully with accusations of bullying. Coherence is what is left over.

Despite this increasingly vocal (and legitimate, according to them) pressure, the Secretary of Economy, Marcelo Ebrard, has insisted that he is holding conversations with Asian governments that would be affected by the possible imposition of new tariffs on almost 1,500 tariff items. Ebrard, with a calm that could easily be sold in bottles, has ruled out the possibility of retaliatory measures, arguing the small detail of the trade deficit that Mexico maintains with the Asian giant. Come on, China sells us much more than we sell to them. And, in a display of exemplary restraint, China has only opened a pair of reciprocity investigations: one for trade and investment restrictions, and another for pecan antidumping. In the end, the final decision on whether or not to impose these controversial tariffs will rest with the Mexican Congress. A most relaxing situation for our deputies.

But not everything is bad news in this commercial idyll. In addition to the purchase-sale relationship, in which China is Mexico’s second supplier, Chinese investment in Mexican territory has been on a rise as steep as a roller coaster. In 2024, investment from that country represented the modest sum of 710 million dollars, funds that have been placed mainly in the states of Guanajuato, Coahuila and the always seductive Mexico City. So economic ties between China and Mexico hang in the balance, as the United States continues to raise the ante on protectionism with the determination of a player at a poker table. “China believes that, in the current context of tariff abuse by the United States, all countries should jointly oppose unilateralism, prevent the spread of protectionism, and avoid imposing restrictions on China under various pretexts due to external pressures,” Beijing said in its latest impassioned statement. A clear message: “Don’t let the big guy boss you around.”

Did you like this walk through the absurd world of commercial geopolitics?Share this analysis, with its touch of sarcasm, on your social networks and help more people understand the twists and turns of the global economy.Explore more content related to the ups and downs of international trade and discover how far the farce goes.

Regresan a casa más de la mitad de migrantes deportados al Congo

Ocho migrantes colombianos y peruanos lograron regresar tras ser deportados al Congo.

Más de la mitad de los 15 migrantes latinoamericanos que Estados Unidos deportó a la República Democrática del Congo en abril ya están de regreso en sus países de origen. Así lo confirmaron autoridades congoleñas y Alma David, abogada que representa a algunos de ellos.

Los deportados fueron enviados al país africano como parte de acuerdos de tercer país seguro impulsados por la administración de Donald Trump. Abogados han cuestionado la medida, señalando que varios contaban con protecciones legales ante el riesgo de persecución si regresaban a sus naciones.

RelatedDemocratic Republic of the Congo confirms 16th Ebola outbreak

El camino de regreso

Ocho personas —entre colombianos y peruanos— retornaron con apoyo de la Organización Internacional para las Migraciones mediante un programa de retorno voluntario asistido. Un colombiano más lo hizo por sus propios medios. La abogada Alma David detalló que estas gestiones se realizaron en las últimas semanas.

El gobierno congoleño calificó los retornos como prueba del carácter temporal del mecanismo y anticipó que podrían ocurrir más salidas pronto. Hasta ahora no se ha informado sobre la situación de los siete migrantes restantes.

Continue reading

Senado de EE.UU. aprueba 70 mil millones para agencias migratorias

El financiamiento para ICE y Patrulla Fronteriza avanza a la Cámara Baja tras intensas negociaciones.

Senado de EE.UU. aprueba millonario financiamiento migratorio

El Senado de Estados Unidos dio luz verde a un proyecto de ley por 70 mil millones de dólares para financiar las operaciones del Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE) y la Patrulla Fronteriza durante tres años. La votación terminó 52 votos a favor y 47 en contra, casi por línea partidista.

La iniciativa ahora pasa a la Cámara de Representantes, que la revisará la próxima semana. La aprobación ocurrió tras semanas de retrasos y negociaciones alrededor de un fondo de compensación de mil 776 millones de dólares vinculado a un acuerdo legal del presidente Donald Trump.

RelatedAudit detects 52 billion without clarification in public account

Varios senadores buscaron impedir que esos recursos beneficiaran a aliados del mandatario que consideran víctimas de persecución política.

Reacciones y detalles de la votación

El líder de la mayoría en el Senado, John Thune, respaldó los recursos para las agencias migratorias y señaló que las disputas sobre el fondo retrasaron innecesariamente el proceso. Una propuesta para redirigir parte de ese dinero hacia agentes heridos durante el asalto al Capitolio del 6 de enero de 2021 fue rechazada.

La republicana Lisa Murkowski fue la única de su partido que votó en contra.

Los demócratas criticaron la medida y exigieron que cualquier financiamiento migratorio incluya mayores controles sobre las acciones de los agentes federales.

Continue reading

John Bolton se declara culpable por información clasificada

El exasesor de Trump evita prisión tras acuerdo por documentos secretos.

Un pacto que evita la cárcel

El exasesor de seguridad nacional de Donald Trump, John Bolton, aceptó declararse culpable de un cargo relacionado con la conservación de información clasificada. El acuerdo con el Departamento de Justicia permite que evite una condena de prisión.

La acusación inicial incluía 18 cargos. Fiscales señalaron que Bolton compartió documentos personales con información confidencial mientras preparaba su libro sobre su paso por la Casa Blanca. El material contenía datos altamente sensibles sobre inteligencia, operaciones gubernamentales y asuntos internacionales.

RelatedBritney Spears pleads guilty and avoids jail

Como parte del pacto, Bolton podría pagar una multa de 2.25 millones de dólares. La pena máxima queda limitada, pero la decisión final la tomará el juez. La próxima audiencia está programada para el 26 de junio en un tribunal federal de Maryland.

El caso generó críticas sobre el uso del Departamento de Justicia para perseguir a figuras consideradas opositoras a Trump. Bolton, conocido por su postura firme en política exterior, se convirtió en crítico del expresidente tras dejar su cargo en 2019.

Este desenlace podría influir en la percepción pública sobre el manejo de información clasificada y la política de seguridad nacional en Estados Unidos.

Continue reading