The Office in Mexico of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (UN-DH) expressed its dismay at the disappearances and subsequent lifeless findings of journalist Roxana Guzmán and journalist and environmental activist Alex Serna, which occurred in June in Veracruz and Guerrero. The organization called on the authorities to clarify the facts, considering the exercise of freedom of expression as a line of investigation.
The case of Roxana Guzmán
Roxana Guzmán ran a digital media outlet and was allegedly the only woman who covered the police source in the south of Veracruz. The UN-DH highlighted the need to protect freedom of expression with a gender perspective, due to the differentiated risks that women journalists face. The Veracruz Prosecutor’s Office confirmed on July 3 the identification of his remains through expert evidence. Eight people were arrested for their probable participation in his kidnapping and deprivation of life.
The case of Alex Serna
Alex Serna investigated environmental issues on the Costa Grande of Guerrero and defended water and land, in addition to denouncing possible acts of corruption. His disappearance was reported at the end of June; He was later found dead in Zihuatanejo. Human rights organizations indicated that he had reported threats arising from his investigations into projects with environmental impact.
The UN-DH stressed that clarifying both cases is essential to combat impunity and guarantee comprehensive reparation to the families.
Amnesty International condemned the deprivation of Roxana Guzmán’s life and demanded an exhaustive investigation with a gender and human rights perspective. The organization warned that in Veracruz at least three journalists have been killed this year.
“No attack against the press can go unpunished,” the organization emphasized.
He also called to adopt effective security measures for those who practice journalism and to investigate the structural causes of these attacks.
“Each murdered journalist is a voice that is being tried to be silenced,” said Amnesty International when reiterating its demand for guarantees of non-repetition.




