Government announces special plan after spike in homicides in Cajeme

A new federal plan is activated as violence escalates in a Sonoran municipality, revealing the urgency.

Because It’s Never Too Late for a Plan… When the Problem is Already

In a turn of events that no one, absolutely no one, could have foreseen (except, perhaps, all the inhabitants of Cajeme), President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo has announced with great fanfare that the federal Security Cabinet has deigned to notice that homicides have increased in that municipality of Sonora. The solution, as is tradition in these parts: a special plan. Because what better way to combat violence than with a good dose of bureaucracy and morning meetings?

The president, in a display of transparency that will surely move us all, explained that the press conference started a little late. The reason? An emergency session with the governor of Sonora, Alfonso Durazo, and the mayor of Cajeme, Javier Lamarque. Picture the scene: the country’s brightest minds, coming together, realizing that… oh, surprise… murders have “gone up a little bit.” A euphemism so delicious it almost tastes like frosting. A “little bit” of violence, like a “little bit” of salt in food, but with corpses.

RelatedArmed men kidnap a woman at a food stand in Cajeme

Excellent Job and Other Charming Euphemisms

Sheinbaum, in his characteristic narrative, did not miss the opportunity to praise the “excellent work” of state and municipal authorities. Of course, it is such excellent work that it has merited the urgent creation of a federal plan to stem the bleeding. It’s like congratulating the captain of the Titanic for his impeccable handling of the first-class deck as the bow sinks into the Atlantic.

The jewel in the crown in this speech was the president’s slip of the tongue: “we are making a special plan to control… not control, but help reduce crimes.” Ah, what a relief! For a moment we thought they wanted to “control” the homicides, which sounds so authoritarian. Better to “help reduce them,” a phrase that evokes the image of the federal government handing out flyers to criminals with the plea: “Wouldn’t you kill a little less, please? We ask you nicely.”

One cannot help but wonder, with purely academic curiosity, what will this famous plan consist of? Will it be a commission to study the commission that supervises the violence analysis subcommittee? Maybe a virtual seminar on the benefits of not shooting neighbors? Or perhaps, and this is just wildly unnecessary speculation, the strategy is to send positive thoughts and good vibes to Cajeme. After all, innovation in security policies has no limits.

The real rhetorical question that hangs in the air, heavier than gunpowder smoke, is: what the hell has been happening for the situation to escalate to the point of needing a high-level meeting to, mind you, “help reduce” crimes? But shhh, let’s not ask awkward questions. Let us instead admire the speed of the government’s reaction, acting just after the problem has become undeniable. Pure efficiency.

In an ideal world, news that the security cabinet is meeting to stem a wave of violence would be… well, the norm. But here, in the glorious national reality, it is material for a tragicomedy. It’s the government equivalent of putting a Band-Aid on a gunshot wound while saying, “Wow, this looks like it hurts.”

So there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. The federal government is “readying” its heavy artillery of plans and support. Meanwhile, in Cajeme, life, or the loss of it, continues. Because the state machinery advances, slowly but surely, always in time to arrive… right after the catastrophe.

Isn’t it wonderful to know that our taxes work hard to generate strategies that arise as a reaction and not as prevention? The next time a homicide “goes up a little,” you know: patience. The special plan is on the way. Eventually.

Are you intrigued to see how this strategy against violence develops? Share this article so more people are aware of the “excellent work” underway, and explore our site for more analysis on the effectiveness of public safety policies.

AICM taxi drivers refuse to apply discounts agreed for the World Cup

Three AICM taxi drivers groups refuse to apply discounts of up to 18% during the World Cup.

Three groups of taxi drivers that operate at the Mexico City International Airport (AICM) refused to apply discounts of up to 18% on their rates during the World Cup. The measure contradicts previous agreements announced by airport authorities and part of the union.

The companies Nueva Imagen, Porto Taxi and Sitio 300 issued a statement to clarify their position. They argued that they have no contractual relationship with the Grupo Aeroportuario Marina (GAM), the entity that promoted the benefits for airport users.

According to permit holders, the announced discounts do not represent a direct reduction in rates. They are, they say, adjustments derived from compensation for improper charges and administrative processes for maintenance work at the AICM.

They demand transparency

The taxi drivers asked the AICM authorities to make public the documents that support these measures. They also called on the GAM to make transparent the minutes and contracts where the application of discounts had been agreed upon. They questioned the legal validity of the obligations attributed to them.

The refusal could affect users who expected more affordable rates during the sporting event. Until now, there is no certainty about the real cost of service at the AICM during the World Cup.

Continue reading

Morena opens the door to a coalition with the PVEM in San Luis Potosí

Morena conditions alliance on PVEM ruling out Ruth González for the governorship.

Morena-PVEM Coalition for 2027?

The state leadership of Morena in San Luis Potosí left open the possibility of an alliance with the Green Ecologist Party (PVEM) for the local elections of 2027. The condition: that the PVEM present a different profile from that of Senator Ruth González.

Rita Ozalia Rodríguez Velázquez, state president of Morena, explained that if the PVEM discards Ruth González—wife of Governor Ricardo Gallardo—the green party could lead the coalition, which would also integrate the Labor Party (PT).

The leader clarified that the relationship with the PVEM at the local level does not face a conflict, although she admitted that there is no direct communication between both state leaders. Decisions about alliances, he said, are made by national leaders.

The possible agreement arises in the midst of the debate about nepotism, after Ruth González’s intention to succeed her husband in the state government was questioned. Morena looks for profiles that avoid that controversy.

Rodríguez Velázquez stressed that there is coordination between the party leadership to define the electoral strategy. For now, the panorama in San Luis Potosí remains open.

Continue reading

Morena accuses INE advisors of being ‘ill-wishers’

The Morena leader accuses INE advisors of being 'ill-wishers' and defends her affiliation system.

Morena questions the impartiality of the INE

The national leader of Morena, Ariadna Montiel Reyes, pointed out that within the INE there are advisors with critical positions towards her party. He described them as “Morena haters” during a press conference where he addressed recent resolutions on duplicate affiliations.

Montiel affirmed that his party abides by the determinations of the Electoral Court. The authority ordered the elimination of more than 93 thousand affiliate records and leave under review about 19 thousand cases that the INE must verify.

The leader demanded that the institute adhere to the resolutions of the General Council and not to individual opinions. He accused that there are figures close to past electoral administrations who maintain a critical stance towards the movement.

Regarding the affiliation system, Montiel defended that Morena’s application is efficient. He assured that it surpasses that of the INE in functionality, since it allows duplications in the records to be detected.

He also proposed that the INE should have real-time verification mechanisms to cross-check affiliation data. However, he acknowledged that there are different processes between parties and the electoral authority.

Continue reading