Lights and shadows of Plan Mexico
Coparmex gave a but to Plan México. Yes, they applaud the simplification of procedures and the single window for foreign trade, but they point out points that could be dynamite.
“The incorporation of Prodecon into the Secretariat of Anti-Corruption and Good Government could generate risks for its proper functioning,” warns the employers’ union.
And, according to them, Prodecon needs total independence to be a true counterweight. They don’t want him to become a puppet.
Judges, security and the great absence
Another red light: the election of judges. Coparmex asks to postpone it until 2028 to avoid “improvisation or biases.” Does it sound familiar to you?
But the real black hole of the plan, according to them, is the lack of a security strategy. They say it clearly:
“Guaranteeing security, justice and peace is not an accessory element, but an essential condition for productive activity.”
The problem of the three levels
Here comes the juicy part: municipal procedures are the nightmare of companies. 36.2% reported problems there. And without coordination between the federation, states and municipalities, this does not work.
Relationship with the United States: be careful with the noise
Coparmex asks for prudence in dealing with the northern neighbor. A very political management, they say, could “put economic stability at risk.”
In summary: Plan Mexico has good intentions, but if these details are not refined, trust remains in the pipeline. And without trust, there is no investment.




