50% tariff on Chinese cars is insufficient according to expert

A former ambassador warns that the fiscal measure will not be enough to contain the massive arrival of vehicles and safeguard local production.

A Cry of Alert in the Automotive World

In a twist that shakes the foundations of national economic policy, the 50 percent tariff that the Mexican government plans to impose on Chinese automobiles has been described as an insufficient measure, a simple caress that would barely “tickle” the Asian giants. The person who issues this warning, full of urgency and experience, is none other than Jorge Guajardo, former Mexican Ambassador to China, who from his trench warns about an imminent deindustrialization.

With the passion of someone who has seen industrial empires fall, Guajardo vehemently declares: “The Government would raise more money, because it will be a tax, but it would not stop the flow of cars and, therefore, the industry would not be protected.” His voice is not that of an alarmist, but that of a prophet who sees how the average export price of a Chinese car has plummeted by an abysmal 25 percent between 2023 and 2025. In the face of this onslaught of prices, a 50 percent tax is revealed as a paper shield.

RelatedTrump threatens 100% tariffs on China for rare earths

The Crude Reality of an Unequal Trade War

The current partner of the consulting firm DGA Group does not stop at superficial criticism. It proposes a drastic solution, a protective measure that would be equivalent to a declaration of economic war: to truly protect the national industry, the tariff should be at least 100 percent, and perhaps it would be necessary to raise it to a shocking 150 percent. This is not a suggestion made lightly; It is a cold calculation in the face of the invasion of Chinese cars that threatens to devastate entire sectors, as has already happened in other nations, including Mexico and the United States.

To illustrate the magnitude of the threat, Guajardo points east, towards Russia. Even the Eurasian nation, Beijing’s main political ally and cornered by Western sanctions, did not hesitate to impose a 60 percent tariff on cars from China. “If Russia imposed a 60 percent tariff,” he argues with overwhelming logic, “a 50 percent tariff on Mexico would only be a first step; we would need to quickly take the second and raise it to 100 percent.” The warning resonates like an echo of a battle that is being lost in silence.

A cable from the Bloomberg agency confirms the worst fears. A 50 percent tariff would not even be able to dent the fierce competitiveness in the domestic market of oriental manufacturers. The evidence is as palpable as the sticker price. BYD, the global colossus of electric vehicles (EVs), sells its Dolphin Mini model in Mexico for an incredible 399,800 pesos. In the opposite corner, GM’s Equinox, one of the cheapest EVs from a traditional brand, has a starting price that almost doubles it: 876,990 pesos. The gap is not competitive; It’s abysmal.

Yale Zhang, general director of the consulting firm Automotive Foresight in Shanghai, states unequivocally: “Chinese new energy vehicles are very competitive in Mexico, especially considering that locally produced gasoline cars tend to be older models and have limited technological features.” It is a truth that hurts, a dagger stuck in the heart of the local industry.

A Ray of Hope in the Tariff Strategy

However, in this bleak panorama, Guajardo finds a glimmer of sanity in the strategy announced by Marcelo Ebrard, Secretary of the Economy. The idea of ​​limiting tariffs to China only to those products that have no substitutes in the region is, in his opinion, a wise move. “If we are bringing a screw from China that no one makes in Mexico or in the United States or in Canada, there is no one who can make it, then don’t put a tariff on it,” he argues pragmatically. “Because you would only be making production more expensive and you would not be protecting any industry.”

This selective approach avoids inflicting collateral damage on the production chain, demonstrating that the battle is not fought with a machine gun, but with a scalpel. The challenge is not to stop trade, but to intelligently redirect it to fortify the national industry against a tide of products that, while cheap, could have a devastating final cost for the Mexican economy.

The story that unfolds is epic. It is the story of a nation struggling to keep its industrial capacity alive in the face of a commercial titan. Each percentage in the tariff, each declaration, each vehicle that arrives at the port, is a movement on a chessboard where the economic future of millions hangs in the balance. The question that hangs in the air, full of suspense, is whether the Mexican authorities will act with the necessary speed and forcefulness before it is too late.

Do you think this is the right strategy?Share this crucial information on your social networks and help us amplify this vital discussion for the region’s industrial future.Explore more content related to the global economy and trade policies on our site.

US Commander meets with Sedena and Semar in Veracruz

Senior military commanders of Mexico and the United States review joint strategies against organized crime.

The commander of the United States Northern Command, General Greg Guillot, visited Mexico to meet with senior officials from the Secretariat of National Defense (Sedena) and the Secretariat of the Navy (Semar). The meetings occurred on July 22 in Veracruz.

Bilateral security cooperation

Guillot met with the head of the Sedena, General Ricardo Trevilla, and with the Secretary of the Navy, Admiral Raymundo Pedro Morales. The US embassy described the meetings as progress in the defense relationship between both countries.

Among the topics addressed are specialized training in special operations and against organized crime, the exchange of information, and cooperation to counter unmanned aerial systems. The North American Maritime Security Initiative was also reviewed.

“The security of North America depends on the strength of its alliances and the ability of its members to act with common objectives,” said General Guillot.

Both nations reiterated their commitment to expanding cooperation, respecting sovereignty, territorial integrity and shared responsibility for security.

Continue reading

T-MEC negotiations: tariffs and regional content on the table

Third round of dialogue between Mexico and the US addresses labor mechanisms and strategic rules.

Key points from the third round

Between July 21 and 23, Mexico and the United States held the third round of negotiations towards the review of the T-MEC. The central issues were tariffs, labor mechanisms, regional content and rules for sectors such as automotive, steel and aluminum.

The president of the Business Coordinating Council (CCE), José Medina Mora, explained that it was proposed to modify the Rapid Response Labor Mechanism to make it reciprocal. Currently, the investigations only apply to companies in Mexican territory.

“It is necessary that the mechanism be applied equitably between both countries,” said Medina Mora.

Another point of discussion was the United States’ intention to increase American content in products made in the region. Mexico defends the concept of regional content and rejects changes that reduce trilateral integration.

The leader added that the seasonality of agricultural products and the impact of tariffs on steel, aluminum and the automotive industry were also reviewed. Some US automakers in Mexico face higher export costs compared to competitors from Japan, Korea and Europe.

For his part, the president of Coparmex, Juan José Sierra, expressed uncertainty regarding the possibility of annual reviews of the treaty, but valued the dialogue between the partners. He indicated that Mexico requires strengthening legal and energy security and the conditions to attract investment.

“It is positive that communication continues, but we need certainty for investors,” said Sierra.

Concamin pointed out that the joint statement between the Secretary of Economy, Marcelo Ebrard, and the US trade representative, Jamieson Greer, confirms that both countries maintain an institutional work path.

Continue reading

Registration of Housing for Wellbeing 2026 begins

Conavi opens registration in 2026 for subsidized housing in 26 states.

The National Housing Commission (Conavi) launched the 2026 call for the Housing for Well-being Program. The objective: to facilitate access to a decent home for low-income families. Registration will be from July 20 to August 2, in modules installed in 26 entities.

Requirements and financing

The scheme adjusts the monthly payments to the family income, so that the payments are accessible. It is aimed at those who cannot access traditional mortgage loans. Those interested must comply: not have their own home, not have current credit from Infonavit, Fovissste or another institution, and receive less than 17,800 pesos per month. Official identification, CURP, proof of address and income are also required.

Participating municipalities

The modules will only be in locations where Conavi will build projects in 2026. Among them: La Paz (Baja California Sur); Champotón (Campeche); Tapachula and Tuxtla Gutiérrez (Chiapas); Aquiles Serdán (Chihuahua); Piedras Negras and San Pedro (Coahuila); Gómez Palacio (Durango); Axapusco and Cuautitlán Izcalli (State of Mexico); Comonfort, Dolores Hidalgo, Pénjamo, San Diego de la Unión, San Luis de la Paz and Tarimoro (Guanajuato); Acapulco de Juárez, Chilpancingo de los Bravo, Coyuca de Benítez and Técpan de Galeana (Guerrero).

The list also includes municipalities of Hidalgo, Jalisco, Michoacán, Nayarit, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala, Veracruz, Yucatán and Zacatecas. Tepic, Xalisco, Puebla, Tehuacán, Tulum, San Luis Potosí and Valladolid stand out.

The program seeks to serve those who need it most, in a context where access to housing continues to be a challenge for millions of Mexicans.

Continue reading