Three films for a weekend of cinema and sarcasm

Three cinematographic proposals, from intimate drama to local horror and a family classic, parade through the theaters for your delight or delirium.

The existential dilemma (sponsored by Cannes)

It seems that the weekend offers us a ruthless choice: go out to face a world that is falling apart or stay in the armchair watching others do it for us. The billboards, in an act of infinite kindness, offer us new bets and some relaunches that, according to them, deserve us to look for those lost coins on the couch and, what is more valuable, to scratch a hole in our agenda. How generous.

First of all, we come across “Enzo”. Director Robin Campillo poses a question that keeps us all awake at night: if you were 16 years old and your future was more than resolved by the simple fact of being born into the right family, would you throw everything overboard to pursue your dreams? Of course yes, Campillo responds with enviable confidence. His creation did not win the Palme d’Or at the last Cannes Festival, but, oh consolation!, he received carloads of applause for his honesty. Imagine: so much honesty it almost hurts. The director immerses his dramatic protagonist in a situation so human that we can almost smell the smell of adolescent uncertainty. Everything gets complicated, as it should, when he meets a young Ukrainian who, through narrative magic, teaches him to see life differently. We cannot reveal more about the plot because, apparently, a single detail would ruin the monumental surprise that awaits. Just know that you will relive those wonderful passages of anxiety, doubt and panic that we all miss so dearly from our youth.

RelatedCannes bans French actor accused of rape despite lack of evidence

Ghosts, nostalgia and the trauma of not having friends

Then there is the turn of a specter that returns to remind us how old we are. Before ghostbusters with their green slime became fashionable, there was a good-hearted spectral entity that only longed for one thing in the afterlife: a friend. His name was Casper (or Gasparín, for those who bought sabritas at the oxxo). This lonely little ghost captivated generations in the 1950s with his cartoons. However, it took four long decades for the industry to pass and for technology to allow it for someone to dare to give it a body (or something similar) in a live-action film. Thus, in 1995—almost 30 years ago, for a shock of reality—this gem was released with Bill Pullman (the same one who saved the world from aliens) and Cristina Ricci (the macabre and adorable Wednesday Addams). The plot, a family comedy where a father and his daughter arrive at a haunted mansion inhabited by Casper and his, in giant quotes, “evil” uncles. How terrifying, right?

Terror made in Mexico (with influencer ingredients)

To close with a panic, the local proposal. Blumhouse, the label that has given us gems to keep us awake like “Paranormal Activity” and “The Purge”, has decided to open a branch in Mexico. His workhorse is “No Me Follows”, a film that, with a marketing campaign worthy of a presidential premiere, will be on one in ten screens in the country. For this feat, they have teamed up with the Mexican production company Maligno, known for “Párvulos.” The perfect setting to terrify the public? The old Canada building in Mexico City, a place with a history so joyous that it includes murders and three decades of neglect. Of course, the protagonist couldn’t be a normal person; No, that would be too boring. She is an influencer specialized in paranormal phenomena, because in the digital age, even ghosts need followers. To bring this horror and social media drama to life, fresh faces like that of Karla Coronado have been chosen. Surely the spirits of the Canada building are delighted with so much exposure on networks.

There you have it, a cinematic menu for all tastes: existential crisis with European touches, ghostly nostalgia and local horror with influencers. Is the choice yours? Or maybe they’re just three different ways to kill time before Monday arrives. Share this cinematographic satire with your friends on social networks and discover more analysis, as scathing as this one, in our culture section.

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce wedding: rumors point to New York

Possible date and location of the most anticipated wedding of the year is filtered.

The link between Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce continues to be one of the most talked about topics of the show. The versions about when and where it will take place have generated expectation among his followers and the international press.

According to recent reports, a permit has been requested from New York City to close streets around Madison Square Garden from July 2 to July 4, with an event scheduled for July 3. The venue also shows a calendar without activities between June 26 and July 6, which reinforces the versions about a possible celebration in that period.

Possible changes of plans

There was initially speculation of a June 13 wedding in Rhode Island, where Swift owns an oceanfront mansion. However, the plans would have changed after leaks to the press. Now the big celebration would be in New York, while the ceremony could have been held privately.

Guest list and security

Although there is no official confirmation, figures such as Selena Gomez, Zoë Kravitz and other close friends of the singer are expected to attend. Guests would have received strict confidentiality agreements, with legal consequences if they revealed information. Some attendees expressed dissatisfaction at not having the option of a companion.

The event would be organized by planner Mark Seed, known for working with celebrities. Security will be a priority: Madison Square Garden offers privacy benefits and multiple accesses, although local authorities are already preparing for a major logistical challenge, in the midst of the World Cup and the Fourth of July celebrations.

For now, neither Swift nor Kelce have officially confirmed the date or location. Followers continue to be attentive to any clues.

Continue reading

Alexis Ayala reveals why her marriage ended

The actor speaks without filters about fatherhood, love and his breakup with Cinthia Aparicio.

What Alexis Ayala said about their separation

Actor Alexis Ayala broke the silence at the presentation of the soap opera “Corazón de Morocco”. He spoke bluntly about the end of his relationship with Cinthia Aparicio, with whom he shared five years: three of dating and just over two of being married.

The breakup, he explained, occurred when he was honest about his feelings. “Let’s see, I think being a dad in life is romanticized, it’s shit, it’s very difficult,” he said. Ayala acknowledged that, although he previously said he was willing to be a father, time made him change his mind. That led Cinthia to decide to end the relationship.

But fatherhood was not the only topic he brought to the table. The actor also criticized the idealization of life as a couple:

“I think it is romanticized to sleep with the same person, in the same bed, every day, that does not mean that you cannot sleep in the same bed or that, suddenly, spaces can occur; the way of talking about these things is not romanticized either.”

The weight of distance

Ayala ruled out that monotony was the cause. The real trigger was the difficulty in seeing each other: “If I had something, it was learning and that is incredibly good and no, the routine of being together did not change for us, the routine of not being together changed for us; there, the couple reconsidered.”

Finally, he left a reflection on the future. He confessed that he wants them both to find love again: “I still have dreams, I still feel hungry, I still want everything, why wouldn’t I want to fall in love? I want him to also fall in love, to be happy and to live happily.”

Continue reading

South Korean justice sanctions stalker of BTS’s Jungkook

Brazilian fan convicted of harassing BTS member in Seoul.

A suspended sentence for harassment of Jungkook

A Brazilian citizen received a one-year suspended prison sentence in South Korea for harassing Jungkook, a member of BTS. The ruling, issued on May 8 by the Seoul Western District Court, found her guilty of violating the anti-harassment law and trespassing, according to The Korea Times.

The woman harassed the singer 22 times between December 7 and 28 of last year. He appeared at his residence and in nearby areas of Yongsan District. He rang the doorbell, loitered, waited for the artist and left objects in the house. On December 13, he took advantage of an open side door while a delivery driver came and went to enter the property. She was arrested, released, but did not stop. In January, authorities issued an emergency order prohibiting him from coming within 100 meters of the singer or his home.

The court imposed a suspended sentence on him: he will avoid prison if he does not commit new crimes or breach conditions for two years. The judges considered that he acted to express his feelings towards Jungkook, without intending to harm him. They also pointed out that she never managed to enter the home and ruled out the risk of recidivism, in part because she will be permanently expelled from South Korea once the sentence becomes final.

It is not the first time that the artist faces this type of situation. Another woman, a Chinese national, was arrested after trying to enter her home using the access code on the day Jungkook concluded his military service.

The case reopens the debate about the safety of K-Pop artists and legal measures against obsessive harassment. South Korean authorities have toughened sanctions to protect public figures.

Continue reading