The promise of information that no one asked for
Regarding the kidnapped miners in Sinaloa, Claudia Sheinbaum has a clear message: wait. The Attorney General’s Office (FGR) will provide details “when relevant.” That phrase, so official, so empty. Relevant to whom? For research or for public opinion that demands answers?
The president mentioned a meeting with the Mining Chamber. There, the companies asked for greater communication with the Security Cabinet. And it was granted to them starting Monday. A bureaucratic triumph while families wait for news of their loved ones.
“They did not suggest that there was an issue of extortion in the mines. That does not mean that it will not happen or that it has occurred in some cases and, in any case, it must be investigated”
There it is. The veiled recognition that the problem could be bigger than admitted, wrapped in the cautious language of someone who knows that every word will be scrutinized.
Sheinbaum highlighted that there is now a “direct relationship” to address cases of extortion in the mining sector. A new channel, created after the fact. It is always comforting to know that protocols are established after the tragedy.
The most revealing: “The Attorney General’s Office is in the investigation and they are the ones who have to report.” The classic pass of responsibility. The executive points to the public ministry, and we all look at the clock as time passes.
The real question, the one that no one asks at a press conference: how many “direct relationships” and “communication channels” are needed before information flows to those who need it most?




