Conflict between Loretta Ortiz and the INE due to alleged electoral inequality
The Magistrate Felipe de la Mata proposed to archive the complaint filed by Minister Loretta Ortiz against the National Electoral Institute (INE), which alleged partiality in the selection process to remain in the Supreme Court of Justice. The electoral judge did not analyze the merits of the case considering that the challenge was presented outside the established legal deadline.
Accusations of inequality and response from the INE
The INE Complaints Commission indicated that Ortiz violated the rules of fairness in the race due to publications made by the Mexican Union of Electricians (SME) on social networks, which favored his candidacy. The agency ordered the elimination of said content to avoid an imbalance in competition.
The minister rejected the accusations, stating: “Regarding the alleged violation of the rules of equity that the INE attributes to me, I must point out that, once again, they are wrong.” However, De la Mata stressed that, since the challenge was presented out of time, its review was not appropriate: “If the presentation of the means of challenge was made outside the legal deadline, it should be rejected.”
Are you interested in learning more about electoral conflicts? Share this analysis and discover other related content on our social networks.




