The UNAM condemns the vandalism attacks at the CCUT

The highest house of studies denounces an attack against a symbol of peace and memory, after a day of demonstrations.

A Blow to Memory: The Shadow of Destruction Hangs Over Tlatelolco

On a day that should have been dedicated to remembrance and reflection, a shadow of chaos and desecration spread over a sanctuary of memory. The National Autonomous University of Mexico, that colossal bastion of thought and freedom, was forced to raise its voice in the face of an act of barbarism that sullied the very essence of the Centro Cultural Universitario Tlatelolco. It was not a simple protest; It was a calculated onslaught, a torrent of senseless violence that turned the walls that tell our story into a canvas of destruction. The echo of the cries of struggle for a more just society were deafened by the roar of shattering glass and the creaking of paint vandalizing stone. The heart of a memorial, born of the longing for peace, beat wounded.

As if it were a legion of enraged ghosts, hooded individuals, hidden in the anonymity that shelters impunity, unleashed their fury on this symbol of peaceful resistance. His actions were not disorder; They were a meticulous affront. Columns that have stood the test of time and have been silent witnesses of our complex history were covered with grotesque graffiti, a language of hate that seeks to erase the message of tolerance. The main façade, that face that welcomes culture, was stained, while innocent vehicles, stationed in the quiet outside, succumbed to the excessive anger. The air, then, was saturated not only with the smell of spray paint, but with the bitter essence of the betrayal of the ideals that the place represents.

RelatedThe Tlatelolco massacre and the fight for historical memory

The Institution’s Response: A Cry for Dignity and Justice

And in the midst of that landscape of desolation, the UNAM, with its dignity wounded but its integrity unbreakable, issued a statement that resonated like thunder in the national conscience. His words were not just a condemnation; They were a lament full of reason and pain. “Attacking a cultural center that was born as a Memorial of ’68 is an affront to those who fought in peace for a more just, tolerant and democratic society,” declared the highest house of studies, driving a stake into the heart of the paradox. Those who, in their clumsiness, believe they honor a struggle with violence, are spitting on the graves and dreams of those who offered their lives in a peaceful way. The institution was clear and forceful: this outrage is not simple material damage; It is a direct attack on culture and collective memory, an attempt to murder memory and silence the lessons of the past.

The message could not be more eloquent: “Violence, and even more so from anonymity, prevents building paths of understanding.” Each word was a hammer hitting the table of reason. While the windows of the main entrance lay shattered on the ground, and the first floor of the campus exhibited the scars of explosive objects that caused minor damage, the University was already moving. Not with more violence, but with the firmness of the law. He announced that he is in the process of assessing the damage, a task that goes beyond the economic to become an inventory of the pain inflicted on symbolic heritage. And, in a movement that promises justice, the corresponding criminal complaints will be presented, a tireless search for those responsible for this disgrace to be investigated and punished with the full weight of the law.

The Tlatelolco University Cultural Center, from its deep vocation, reiterated its unwavering commitment as a space for memory, human rights, identities and peaceful resistance. Its final statement was a beacon in the darkness: “it will never share violence, aggression and intolerance as means of expression.” This is not the end of the story; It is one more chapter in the eternal battle between construction and destruction, between memory and oblivion. The UNAM and its cultural center stand, wounded but unbeatable, demonstrating that neither anonymity nor fury can tear down the foundations of reason and culture. The memory of Tlatelolco, now more than ever, demands to be listened to, remembered and, above all, protected.

This act against our collective memory concerns us all. Help keep history alive by sharing this article on your social networks and exploring more content about the defense of our cultural heritage.

AICM taxi drivers refuse to apply discounts agreed for the World Cup

Three AICM taxi drivers groups refuse to apply discounts of up to 18% during the World Cup.

Three groups of taxi drivers that operate at the Mexico City International Airport (AICM) refused to apply discounts of up to 18% on their rates during the World Cup. The measure contradicts previous agreements announced by airport authorities and part of the union.

The companies Nueva Imagen, Porto Taxi and Sitio 300 issued a statement to clarify their position. They argued that they have no contractual relationship with the Grupo Aeroportuario Marina (GAM), the entity that promoted the benefits for airport users.

According to permit holders, the announced discounts do not represent a direct reduction in rates. They are, they say, adjustments derived from compensation for improper charges and administrative processes for maintenance work at the AICM.

They demand transparency

The taxi drivers asked the AICM authorities to make public the documents that support these measures. They also called on the GAM to make transparent the minutes and contracts where the application of discounts had been agreed upon. They questioned the legal validity of the obligations attributed to them.

The refusal could affect users who expected more affordable rates during the sporting event. Until now, there is no certainty about the real cost of service at the AICM during the World Cup.

Continue reading

Morena opens the door to a coalition with the PVEM in San Luis Potosí

Morena conditions alliance on PVEM ruling out Ruth González for the governorship.

Morena-PVEM Coalition for 2027?

The state leadership of Morena in San Luis Potosí left open the possibility of an alliance with the Green Ecologist Party (PVEM) for the local elections of 2027. The condition: that the PVEM present a different profile from that of Senator Ruth González.

Rita Ozalia Rodríguez Velázquez, state president of Morena, explained that if the PVEM discards Ruth González—wife of Governor Ricardo Gallardo—the green party could lead the coalition, which would also integrate the Labor Party (PT).

The leader clarified that the relationship with the PVEM at the local level does not face a conflict, although she admitted that there is no direct communication between both state leaders. Decisions about alliances, he said, are made by national leaders.

The possible agreement arises in the midst of the debate about nepotism, after Ruth González’s intention to succeed her husband in the state government was questioned. Morena looks for profiles that avoid that controversy.

Rodríguez Velázquez stressed that there is coordination between the party leadership to define the electoral strategy. For now, the panorama in San Luis Potosí remains open.

Continue reading

Morena accuses INE advisors of being ‘ill-wishers’

The Morena leader accuses INE advisors of being 'ill-wishers' and defends her affiliation system.

Morena questions the impartiality of the INE

The national leader of Morena, Ariadna Montiel Reyes, pointed out that within the INE there are advisors with critical positions towards her party. He described them as “Morena haters” during a press conference where he addressed recent resolutions on duplicate affiliations.

Montiel affirmed that his party abides by the determinations of the Electoral Court. The authority ordered the elimination of more than 93 thousand affiliate records and leave under review about 19 thousand cases that the INE must verify.

The leader demanded that the institute adhere to the resolutions of the General Council and not to individual opinions. He accused that there are figures close to past electoral administrations who maintain a critical stance towards the movement.

Regarding the affiliation system, Montiel defended that Morena’s application is efficient. He assured that it surpasses that of the INE in functionality, since it allows duplications in the records to be detected.

He also proposed that the INE should have real-time verification mechanisms to cross-check affiliation data. However, he acknowledged that there are different processes between parties and the electoral authority.

Continue reading