Investigation for feminicide and vicarious violence against a doctor in Puebla
The State Attorney General’s Office (FGE) of Puebla has initiated a formal investigation against the doctor Armando “N”, assigned to Hospital Ángeles, following accusations by his ex-wife, September Vélez, for alleged crimes of attempted feminicide, vicarious violence and illegal child abduction. The case, publicly reported on May 25, has caught the attention of federal authorities, including the Secretary of Women, led by Citlalli Hernández, who emphasized the importance of avoiding impunity to guarantee justice.
Details of the complaint and institutional actions
September Vélez released a testimonial video on social networks detailing episodes of physical assault, death threats and the abduction of his two children, despite having legal custody. The images show the doctor dragging her by the hair, in addition to alleging that he threatened her with a firearm. In response, the Angeles Hospital preventively suspended Armando “N”, a measure applauded by Hernández as a “crucial step to protect the victims.”
The federal official stressed on her networks: “The eradication of gender violence requires immediate and transparent actions”, referring to the FGE’s commitment to act in accordance with the law. Meanwhile, Vélez requested the direct intervention of President Claudia Sheinbaum to speed up the process.
Profile of the accused and legal controversies
Armando “N”, specialist in gastroenterology and robotic surgery graduated from the UPAEP, also faces accusations of systematic psychological violence during his marriage to Vélez, who was 18 years old when they got married (he, 47). The victim claims that the doctor manipulated the legal system to retain the minors, despite there being a court order in his favor.
In response, the doctor released a defense video on May 27, calling the accusations defamation and alleging that Vélez mistreated his eldest son, which — according to him — justified an protection to maintain temporary custody. However, criminal law experts point out that this resource does not exempt from investigating charges of gender violence.
Context and analysis
This case shows the challenges in the application of protocols against vicarious violence—a modality that uses children as an instrument of coercion—, still little recognized in Mexico. Organizations such as Amnesty International have documented that 72% of complaints of family violence do not reach a sentence, which reinforces the urgency of judicial training in a gender perspective.
The doctor’s suspension from work is a relevant precedent, since few private institutions act ex officio in these cases. However, feminist groups demand that the FGE not limit the investigation to criminal matters, but rather review possible medical negligence or abuse of authority in the hospital environment.
What’s next? The case could escalate to the National Human Rights Commission if the investigations are delayed. Meanwhile, social pressure on digital platforms maintains scrutiny of the authorities.
Share this information to make the fight against gender violence visible and explore more content on human rights on our portal.




