Because counting votes is as easy as adding 2+2… or is it?
Ah, the INE, that organization that reminds us that democracy is not cheap. It turns out that, in a twist that no one saw coming (100% sarcasm), they need an additional 232 million pesos to hire 25,245 temporary employees. The reason? Well, apparently, counting judicial votes is as simple as making a grocery list… but with 300 precinct meetings, thousands of ballots, and the pressure to make no mistake so that no one screams “fraud!” again.
And they already had a cut budget of only 592 million to pay regular employees. But, surprise surprise, it turns out that storing documents, guarding ballot boxes, and doing basic math under pressure requires more hands. Who would have thought? So now, in addition to the regular officials, there will be 22,500 auxiliaries (yes, twenty-two thousand five hundred) dedicated exclusively to adding votes as if they were points on a primary exam. Each one earning between 15,000 and 17,500 pesos for… 15 days of work! Not bad for a temporary job, huh?
Indelible ink: the secret weapon against “double voting”
Meanwhile, the IPN delivered 178,033 bottles of indelible ink, that magical substance that supposedly lasts 12 hours on your finger… unless you use bleach, because, of course, in Mexico there is always a “smart one” who figures out how to erase it. Councilor Guadalupe Taddei praised this invention as a “great contribution to democracy.” Although, between us, if democracy depended only on a liquid that is removed with bleach, we would be in trouble.
On the other hand, the UAM certified that the ink meets the standards… well, at least in the laboratory. Because in real life, we already know that there will be those who swear that it was deleted after five minutes. But hey, that’s better than nothing, right?
Esquivel and the art of deleting tweets as an electoral strategy
And speaking of traps (ahem), Minister Yasmín Esquivel, aspiring to stay in the Supreme Court, continues playing cat and mouse with the INE. For the third time, she published the support of a union on social networks (something prohibited) and, oh coincidence, she deleted the tweets just before the INE sanctioned her. Coincidence? Of course not! The counselors, very fed up, reminded her that erasing evidence does not make her innocent, just more obvious. But what does it matter? Overall, the Specialized Chamber will decide if this was a trick or a “technical error.” We bet on the first.
In short, while the INE spends millions on staff, ink and patience, the candidates continue to run “ingenious” (read: questionable) campaigns. Of the 3,398 applicants, only five have requested protection. Which, considering the country’s history of electoral violence, is either a miracle or there are many brave (or reckless) people.
Moral? Democracy is expensive, complicated and sometimes ridiculous. But here we continue, watching the show.
Did you enjoy this summary? Share it and continue exploring more content about the electoral circus! Because, let’s be honest, this is more of a soap opera than the morning ones.




