Impact of the bombings on Iranian nuclear facilities
The former president of the United States, Donald Trump, declared this Sunday that the air strikes carried out by US forces against nuclear complexes in Iran caused “monumental” damage. This statement contrasts with the warnings of his own advisors, who pointed out that it is premature to quantify the real impact.
Through a message on his Truth Social platform, Trump praised the precision of the military operations: “The impacts were hard and exact. Our military demonstrated great skill.” In addition, he used the slogan “MIGA” (Make Iran Great Again), hinting at his support for a change of government in Tehran.
Contradictory assessments and global risks
While the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, stated that the Iranian nuclear program was “devastated”, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, clarified that the definitive analysis will require more time. According to preliminary reports, three strategic locations suffered severe destruction.
Operation “Midnight Hammer” involved seven B-2 stealth bombers, which completed an 18-hour mission without being detected by Iranian defense systems. This technical detail underlines the sophistication of the attack.
In parallel, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, warned the UN Security Council about the impossibility of verifying damage to underground facilities such as Fordow, key to uranium enrichment. Grossi emphasized: “Attacks on nuclear sites can trigger radioactive leaks with catastrophic consequences.”.
Geopolitical implications and reactions
The conflict escalated after Iran’s request for an urgent meeting at the UN, where it accused the US of violating international law. Global security experts warn that these events could reconfigure the balance of power in the Middle East and affect negotiations on arms control.
Analysts agree that, beyond the rhetoric, the inability to assess damage to nuclear reactors represents an unprecedented environmental risk. The scientific community urges an independent inspection to rule out radiological contamination.
Are you interested in geopolitics and its technological effects? Share this analysis on your social networks and discover more content on international security in our specialized section.




