Exclusion of groups in reform on disappearances generates controversy
The Secretary of the Interior (Segob) finalized the modifications to the reform initiative regarding the disappearance of persons presented by President Claudia Sheinbaum, but failed to integrate key proposals from search groups. Despite the participation of around 400 organizations, only three platforms had direct influence on the final wording, according to sources close to the process.
Technical details of the reform
Of the 32 articles reviewed, 21 received adjustments, supposedly incorporating more than 570 proposals from national groups. Among the notable changes is the expansion of powers for the Executive Commission for Attention to Victims (CEAV), which will now have a voice and vote in the National Person Search System. However, the head of the CEAV, Yuriria Rodríguez, faces rejection from organizations that demand her resignation.
Another relevant point is the regulation of the use of the CURP in search requests. The reform establishes that the authorities must request it, but they cannot condition the procedure on its presentation, an advance to speed up procedures in urgent cases.
Criticism for lack of transparency
Organizations such as Luciérnagas Buscadoras and Decofem denounced that they were not informed about the final agreements. Laura Cázares, representative of Decofem, described the process as “a simulation”, pointing out that technical tables were scheduled without specific dates. For her part, Thalía, from Luciérnagas Buscadoras, questioned the selectivity in communication: “Why with certain groups yes and not with us?”.
The National People Search Union and Network, which participated in more than 17 meetings, defended the process, while the LGBTTIQ Contingent highlighted article-by-article reviews. However, groups such as The United Forces for Our Disappeared in Nuevo León called the reform “regressive” and asked for international supervision.
Next steps and skepticism
The initiative will be sent to the Senate during the special period of sessions, but organizations such as the Network of the Disappeared in Colima doubt its approval this year. Blanca Ramírez, a member of the network, expressed: “It may be in the law, but if they don’t apply it, it’s useless.”
The Movement for Our Disappeared urged Congress to consider the agreements in the ruling, while international organizations monitor compliance with human rights standards.
Are you interested in delving deeper into how this reform affects the families of missing people? Share this analysis on your social networks and help us make this crucial issue visible. Explore more content about justice and human rights on our site.




