Context and background of the controversy
Deputies of the National Action Party (PAN) have formally requested President Claudia Sheinbaum to dismiss Alex Tonatiuh Márquez Hernández, director of Customs Investigation, after revealing the acquisition of a luxury penthouse in Polanco at a price significantly below market value. The official, nicknamed “Lord Relojes”, faces accusations of illicit enrichment and conflict of interest, linked to alleged irregularities in the management of public resources.
Details of the accusations
According to journalistic investigations by Grupo REFORMA, Márquez Hernández bought a property valued at 22 million pesos last March for only 7.7 million, a transaction carried out with Colonel Antonio Buchan Martínez. This case has raised questions about the origin of the funds, since the official’s declared income would not justify said disbursement. Federal deputy Federico Döring pointed out that, despite the investigations by the Tax Administration Service (SAT) that began a year ago, Márquez Hernández continues in office.
“Axel is in charge of protecting the fiscal huachicol of Andrés Manuel López Beltrán,” Döring stated during his speech. The legislator linked the director’s permanence in Customs with alleged political interests, alleging that control of this agency falls on figures close to the former president.
Political and legal implications
The situation has exposed tensions within the federal government. Ernesto Sánchez, another PAN deputy, criticized the inaction of the Anti-Corruption Secretariat, which he described as a “white elephant”, and demanded that Márquez Hernández’s links with the Aledo company, currently under scrutiny by the SAT, be investigated. Sánchez emphasized the incongruity between the administration’s austerity discourse and the lavish expenses of officials.
Legislators compared this case to the removal of Pablo Gómez from the Financial Intelligence Unit (UIF), demanding parity in treatment. “Every day that Sheinbaum does not act, he becomes an accomplice,” Döring declared, referring to the alleged corruption networks in the importation of illegal fuels.
Impact analysis
This scenario reflects a recurring pattern in accusations against high-level officials: the lack of transparency in assets and the perception of impunity. Anti-corruption experts point out that cases like this erode institutional trust and show flaws in oversight mechanisms. The absence of strong answers could intensify the debate on the independence of organizations such as the SAT.
In addition, the use of the term “huachicol fiscal”—which refers to diversions of public resources— has permeated political discourse, calling into question the economic policies of the current administration.
Call to action
Given the seriousness of the accusations, the deputies urged citizens to stay informed and demand accountability. Share this information on your social networks to expand public debate and explore more content on government transparency on our platforms. Collective surveillance is key to combating opacity.
