Delcy Rodríguez assumes power in Venezuela after Maduro’s capture

A new leader takes charge amid an unprecedented crisis, while the former president faces charges abroad and the country's future hangs in the balance.

A plot twist that not even the most creative screenwriter would dare to write

Well, then hold on because the Venezuelan political soap opera has just launched its most surreal season. In an episode that mixes House of Cards with a Call of Duty mission, Delcy Rodríguez has gone from vice president to president in charge of Venezuela. The trigger? That his boss and ally, Nicolás Maduro, was literally captured by the United States in a nighttime military operation that sounds more like an action movie than international diplomacy. Now, she is offering to “collaborate” with the Donald Trump administration, in what could be the geopolitical plot twist of the year, or simply a desperate attempt to not go down with the ship.

Rodríguez, who since 2018 has been pulling the strings of the Venezuelan oil economy as if it were a video game in difficult mode, was sworn in on Monday before the National Assembly. Meanwhile, Maduro was making his debut in a New York court, facing narcoterrorism charges and pleading not guilty with a face that surely deserves a meme. The scene is worthy of a crossover between a judicial series and a political thriller.

RelatedThe United States carries out a military operation and captures Maduro in Venezuela

A discourse between pain and strategy

With his hand raised in a luxurious hall of the Legislative Palace, Rodríguez gave a speech that had more layers than an onion. “I come with pain for the suffering that has been caused to the people,” he said, referring to the “illegitimate military aggression.” He also spoke of the “kidnapping” of two “heroes”: Maduro himself and the first lady, Cilia Flores. An emotional script, although many wonder if behind those words there is a political survival manual.

The truth is that Rodríguez and a group of senior officials of Chavismo now seem to be in control, even with Trump threatening from Washington. The Venezuelan Supreme Court of Justice, in a move that no one saw coming on Saturday, ordered her to take over as acting president, and the army, that eternal arbiter of power in the country, gave her its support. A key support in a nation where those in uniform usually have the last word.

And now what? The implications of a scrambled board

Rodríguez, a 56-year-old lawyer with training in the United Kingdom and France, has been the faithful shield of the revolution since the time of Hugo Chávez. The big question at the moment is whether he will approach the Trump administration or follow the line of confrontation of his predecessor. Her promotion was so surprising that even Trump himself announced that his Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, had been speaking with her and described her as “courteous.” Rubio, for his part, dropped the gem that he could work with her, unlike Maduro. Come on, a change of protagonist approved by the villain of the story.

However, in a televised speech, Rodríguez initially showed no desire to cooperate, calling the Trump government “extremist” and defending Maduro’s legitimacy. But, oh surprise, on Sunday he published a message on Instagram (because today even geopolitical crises are managed on networks) with a conciliatory tone, talking about building “respectful relationships” and “shared development“. A turn worthy of an influencer who rectifies after a controversy, but on a state level.

The profile of the new protagonist: between the family legacy and Wall Street

The interim president and her brother, Jorge Rodríguez (head of the National Assembly), have leftist credentials peppered with family drama. His father was a socialist leader who died in police custody after being involved in a kidnapping in the 1970s. Unlike others in Maduro’s circle, the Rodríguezes have (so far) dodged criminal charges in the US, although Delcy did face US sanctions for undermining democracy.

The most ironic thing about his profile is his ties with Republicans in the oil industry and Wall Street. Yes, the same one who chaired an assembly to counter the opposition in 2017, also knows how to move in the circles of capital. A complex character who enjoys a “very particular” relationship with power and the Armed Forces, according to analysts.

Threats, deadlines and the uncertain future

Trump wasted no time in raising the stakes. He warned that if Rodríguez did not fall in line, “he will pay a very high price, probably higher than Maduro,” and demanded “full access” to infrastructure and oil. Meanwhile, analysts such as Geoff Ramsey of the Atlantic Council speculate that his initially firm tone may have been an attempt to “save face” with his base, because it is clear that Maduro’s capture required some internal collaboration.

Venezuela’s Constitution requires elections in 30 days if the president becomes “permanently unavailable.” But the loyal Supreme Court, in its decision on Saturday, declared Maduro’s absence as “temporary”, activating an article that allows the vice president (a non-elected position) to govern for up to 90 days, extendable to six months. And therein lies the trick: the court did not mention that limit, leaving the door open for Rodríguez to try to stay longer, unifying the Chavista factions and avoiding an electoral challenge that, let’s be honest, the ruling party does not even want.

In summary, we are facing a political experiment of extremely high risk. A leader with one foot in the revolution and the other in the pragmatic international reality, trying to navigate a country in crisis under the shadow of an imprisoned former president and a US government with its eyes fixed on oil. The only sure spoiler is that the next chapters promise to be, at the very least, unpredictable.

Were you surprised by this turn in Venezuelan politics? Share this analysis on your social networks and explore more content about the geopolitical movements that are defining our era.

The US will send a delegation to Brazil to question electronic voting

Two State Department officials will travel to Brasilia to review the electronic ballot box system.

Donald Trump’s government is preparing to send two senior State Department officials to Brasilia. The objective: to question the reliability of the Brazilian electronic voting system, just over two months before the presidential elections on October 4.

United States Mission

The information was published by The Washington Post, which cites American and Brazilian sources. The delegation would consist of Riley M. Barnes, deputy secretary, and Samuel Samson, deputy assistant secretary. According to the newspaper, both plan to meet with critics of the electronic ballot box system and collect information to prepare a report that calls into question the reliability of the voting mechanism.

The government of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva considers the initiative an attempt to interfere in the electoral process. He assured that he will act to prevent any effect on the elections. Two senior Brazilian diplomats described the mission as:

“Completely incompatible with Brazilian democracy”

And they affirmed that the Executive will protect the integrity of the process.

Reaction and context

The State Department confirmed the trip, but avoided responding to the objective or any possible questions about the integrity of the Brazilian electoral system. The mission occurs amid tensions between Washington and Brasilia, aggravated by the tariffs imposed by the United States on Brazilian products and by the judicial process against former President Jair Bolsonaro for the alleged attempt to prevent Lula’s inauguration after the 2022 elections.

In recent days, Flavio Bolsonaro – presidential candidate and son of the former president – once again questioned the reliability of electronic ballot boxes. He returned to complaints that were already rejected by the Superior Electoral Tribunal (TSE).

The elections will pit current President Lula, who is seeking a new mandate, against Flavio Bolsonaro. The campaign is dominated by polarization and disputes over the transparency of the process. The electronic voting system continues to be supported by the TSE and international observers, who so far have not detected evidence of fraud.

Continue reading

Trump criticizes journalists and opponents at correspondents’ dinner

Trump attacked 'fake news' and opposition politicians before 700 attendees.

The president of the United States, Donald Trump, took advantage of the correspondents’ dinner in New York to launch criticism against the press and his political adversaries. The event was held at the Waldorf Astoria hotel, three months after an alleged attempted attack on Trump forced its suspension.

Criticism of the press and the opposition

Before about 700 people, Trump adopted a lighter tone than expected, although he did not stop referring to “fake news.” Between jokes, he claimed to have won the elections three times, repeating the theory of fraud in 2020 that he has never been able to prove.

“They have no idea how lucky they are. When I’m gone, they’re going to go bankrupt. Their business model will end. There won’t be anyone to report on. Nobody gives a damn about anyone else,” the president said.

The statements come in a context of tension between the White House and the media, which Trump has repeatedly described as “enemies of the people.” During his speech, he also criticized Democratic politicians and described some Republican opponents as “disloyal.”

The speech, although with a less confrontational tone than on previous occasions, made it clear that Trump maintains his strategy of discrediting the independent press and those who oppose his political agenda.

Continue reading

Charges against 11 for migrant smuggling with 7 dead in Texas

Eleven people face charges in the US for migrant smuggling. Seven died in a container in Texas.

The United States Federal Prosecutor’s Office filed charges against 11 people for their alleged participation in a migrant smuggling network. The case is linked to the death of seven people who were traveling hidden in a railway container in Texas.

The victims, originally from Honduras and Mexico, died in May due to high temperatures while being transported to the interior of the country.

Details of the tragedy

According to authorities, the group boarded a train in the border city of Del Río bound for San Antonio. The smugglers abandoned the container after one of the migrants fell while opening the door.

The next day, a Union Pacific employee discovered the bodies of six people inside the container at a Laredo rail yard. A seventh victim had been left next to the tracks.

The investigation determined that the container remained completely sealed, with no ventilation or cooling system. This caused the migrants to suffer heat stroke. Among the deceased was a 14-year-old teenager.

The prosecution detailed that one of the victims managed to communicate with his relatives while he was dying inside the container.

Actions of the authority

The 11 defendants face charges of conspiracy to transport foreigners and facilitating their transfer resulting in death. Crimes that could lead to life in prison.

Nine of the alleged perpetrators have already been arrested in different operations carried out in Texas. Two remain at large. Authorities reported that those involved include US citizens and permanent residents.

Continue reading