Delcy Rodríguez assumes power in Venezuela after Maduro’s capture

A new leader takes charge amid an unprecedented crisis, while the former president faces charges abroad and the country's future hangs in the balance.

A plot twist that not even the most creative screenwriter would dare to write

Well, then hold on because the Venezuelan political soap opera has just launched its most surreal season. In an episode that mixes House of Cards with a Call of Duty mission, Delcy Rodríguez has gone from vice president to president in charge of Venezuela. The trigger? That his boss and ally, Nicolás Maduro, was literally captured by the United States in a nighttime military operation that sounds more like an action movie than international diplomacy. Now, she is offering to “collaborate” with the Donald Trump administration, in what could be the geopolitical plot twist of the year, or simply a desperate attempt to not go down with the ship.

Rodríguez, who since 2018 has been pulling the strings of the Venezuelan oil economy as if it were a video game in difficult mode, was sworn in on Monday before the National Assembly. Meanwhile, Maduro was making his debut in a New York court, facing narcoterrorism charges and pleading not guilty with a face that surely deserves a meme. The scene is worthy of a crossover between a judicial series and a political thriller.

RelatedThe United States carries out a military operation and captures Maduro in Venezuela

A discourse between pain and strategy

With his hand raised in a luxurious hall of the Legislative Palace, Rodríguez gave a speech that had more layers than an onion. “I come with pain for the suffering that has been caused to the people,” he said, referring to the “illegitimate military aggression.” He also spoke of the “kidnapping” of two “heroes”: Maduro himself and the first lady, Cilia Flores. An emotional script, although many wonder if behind those words there is a political survival manual.

The truth is that Rodríguez and a group of senior officials of Chavismo now seem to be in control, even with Trump threatening from Washington. The Venezuelan Supreme Court of Justice, in a move that no one saw coming on Saturday, ordered her to take over as acting president, and the army, that eternal arbiter of power in the country, gave her its support. A key support in a nation where those in uniform usually have the last word.

And now what? The implications of a scrambled board

Rodríguez, a 56-year-old lawyer with training in the United Kingdom and France, has been the faithful shield of the revolution since the time of Hugo Chávez. The big question at the moment is whether he will approach the Trump administration or follow the line of confrontation of his predecessor. Her promotion was so surprising that even Trump himself announced that his Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, had been speaking with her and described her as “courteous.” Rubio, for his part, dropped the gem that he could work with her, unlike Maduro. Come on, a change of protagonist approved by the villain of the story.

However, in a televised speech, Rodríguez initially showed no desire to cooperate, calling the Trump government “extremist” and defending Maduro’s legitimacy. But, oh surprise, on Sunday he published a message on Instagram (because today even geopolitical crises are managed on networks) with a conciliatory tone, talking about building “respectful relationships” and “shared development“. A turn worthy of an influencer who rectifies after a controversy, but on a state level.

The profile of the new protagonist: between the family legacy and Wall Street

The interim president and her brother, Jorge Rodríguez (head of the National Assembly), have leftist credentials peppered with family drama. His father was a socialist leader who died in police custody after being involved in a kidnapping in the 1970s. Unlike others in Maduro’s circle, the Rodríguezes have (so far) dodged criminal charges in the US, although Delcy did face US sanctions for undermining democracy.

The most ironic thing about his profile is his ties with Republicans in the oil industry and Wall Street. Yes, the same one who chaired an assembly to counter the opposition in 2017, also knows how to move in the circles of capital. A complex character who enjoys a “very particular” relationship with power and the Armed Forces, according to analysts.

Threats, deadlines and the uncertain future

Trump wasted no time in raising the stakes. He warned that if Rodríguez did not fall in line, “he will pay a very high price, probably higher than Maduro,” and demanded “full access” to infrastructure and oil. Meanwhile, analysts such as Geoff Ramsey of the Atlantic Council speculate that his initially firm tone may have been an attempt to “save face” with his base, because it is clear that Maduro’s capture required some internal collaboration.

Venezuela’s Constitution requires elections in 30 days if the president becomes “permanently unavailable.” But the loyal Supreme Court, in its decision on Saturday, declared Maduro’s absence as “temporary”, activating an article that allows the vice president (a non-elected position) to govern for up to 90 days, extendable to six months. And therein lies the trick: the court did not mention that limit, leaving the door open for Rodríguez to try to stay longer, unifying the Chavista factions and avoiding an electoral challenge that, let’s be honest, the ruling party does not even want.

In summary, we are facing a political experiment of extremely high risk. A leader with one foot in the revolution and the other in the pragmatic international reality, trying to navigate a country in crisis under the shadow of an imprisoned former president and a US government with its eyes fixed on oil. The only sure spoiler is that the next chapters promise to be, at the very least, unpredictable.

Were you surprised by this turn in Venezuelan politics? Share this analysis on your social networks and explore more content about the geopolitical movements that are defining our era.

Papa León XIV llama a la reconciliación en su primer discurso en España

El Papa insta a superar divisiones; el rey aborda por primera vez los abusos en la Iglesia.

Un llamado a la unidad

El Papa León XIV pronunció su primer discurso en España con un mensaje claro: abandonar las narrativas divisorias y los enfoques identitarios. “Vengo a confirmar, animar e inspirar una renovada fidelidad al Evangelio”, afirmó en español, idioma que aprendió durante su estancia en Perú.

El pontífice subrayó que la cultura del encuentro, y no del conflicto, es la que genera estabilidad y prosperidad. La ceremonia de bienvenida se realizó en el Palacio Real de Madrid con 250 invitados del ámbito político y diplomático.

RelatedCelebrities say goodbye to Pope Francis with emotional messages

El rey y los abusos

El rey Felipe VI destacó como un privilegio compartir la lengua con el Papa y recordó su labor pastoral en Chiclayo como obispo de la Orden de San Agustín. Además, calificó la primera encíclica del pontífice, Magnifica Humanitas, como un texto de esperanza ante desafíos como la inteligencia artificial.

Por primera vez, el monarca se refirió a los casos de abuso dentro de la Iglesia católica. Sostuvo que quienes cometieron esos actos no representan a la comunidad eclesial. Añadió que la claridad y firmeza del Papa son esenciales en el proceso de sanación y reparación de las víctimas.

Finalmente, el jefe de Estado español subrayó que la dignidad de la persona, los derechos humanos, los valores democráticos y la legalidad internacional deben mantenerse como pilares fundamentales.

Continue reading

Regresan a casa más de la mitad de migrantes deportados al Congo

Ocho migrantes colombianos y peruanos lograron regresar tras ser deportados al Congo.

Más de la mitad de los 15 migrantes latinoamericanos que Estados Unidos deportó a la República Democrática del Congo en abril ya están de regreso en sus países de origen. Así lo confirmaron autoridades congoleñas y Alma David, abogada que representa a algunos de ellos.

Los deportados fueron enviados al país africano como parte de acuerdos de tercer país seguro impulsados por la administración de Donald Trump. Abogados han cuestionado la medida, señalando que varios contaban con protecciones legales ante el riesgo de persecución si regresaban a sus naciones.

RelatedDemocratic Republic of the Congo confirms 16th Ebola outbreak

El camino de regreso

Ocho personas —entre colombianos y peruanos— retornaron con apoyo de la Organización Internacional para las Migraciones mediante un programa de retorno voluntario asistido. Un colombiano más lo hizo por sus propios medios. La abogada Alma David detalló que estas gestiones se realizaron en las últimas semanas.

El gobierno congoleño calificó los retornos como prueba del carácter temporal del mecanismo y anticipó que podrían ocurrir más salidas pronto. Hasta ahora no se ha informado sobre la situación de los siete migrantes restantes.

Continue reading

Senado de EE.UU. aprueba 70 mil millones para agencias migratorias

El financiamiento para ICE y Patrulla Fronteriza avanza a la Cámara Baja tras intensas negociaciones.

Senado de EE.UU. aprueba millonario financiamiento migratorio

El Senado de Estados Unidos dio luz verde a un proyecto de ley por 70 mil millones de dólares para financiar las operaciones del Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE) y la Patrulla Fronteriza durante tres años. La votación terminó 52 votos a favor y 47 en contra, casi por línea partidista.

La iniciativa ahora pasa a la Cámara de Representantes, que la revisará la próxima semana. La aprobación ocurrió tras semanas de retrasos y negociaciones alrededor de un fondo de compensación de mil 776 millones de dólares vinculado a un acuerdo legal del presidente Donald Trump.

RelatedAudit detects 52 billion without clarification in public account

Varios senadores buscaron impedir que esos recursos beneficiaran a aliados del mandatario que consideran víctimas de persecución política.

Reacciones y detalles de la votación

El líder de la mayoría en el Senado, John Thune, respaldó los recursos para las agencias migratorias y señaló que las disputas sobre el fondo retrasaron innecesariamente el proceso. Una propuesta para redirigir parte de ese dinero hacia agentes heridos durante el asalto al Capitolio del 6 de enero de 2021 fue rechazada.

La republicana Lisa Murkowski fue la única de su partido que votó en contra.

Los demócratas criticaron la medida y exigieron que cualquier financiamiento migratorio incluya mayores controles sobre las acciones de los agentes federales.

Continue reading